My leadership theory
Leadership is the ability and willingness of a person to perform a specific task. Here ability is the persons own ability of doing things. It depends on his skills and the Personel experience. Willingness is his commitment to work. The person should be dedicated to what he is doing and he must have faith in his work.
There are leaders who always give much information which is sometimes not related to the topic. But much information falls on unready ears. They never know when some valuable piece of information is going to come out from a leader’s speech. The speakers are ready to send out the information at all the time but the receivers are not ready.
When a new graduate student steps in to the real corporate world there are many things he will come across like management, leadership, responsibility, deadlines, weekly status etc. The best way to start is to know your instructor and start taking the responsibilities slowly.
Analysis is one of the key ways of thinking. “Analyzing the available information and rank ordering this information from most important to least important” (Johnston, 2007)
One should remember that he is not in an entry level in a job. He is already in an escalator when the moment he chooses to enter the graduate school (Dr. Gillette, Personal Communication, June 20, 2007). He should find his responsibilities and start talking the notes from his advisors. Seniors can give the best guide lines when one enters into a new company/ organization.
The average person occupying a position of leadership should exceed the average member of his group to some degree in the factors like capacity, achievement, responsibility, participation and status.
The leadership is a phenomenon which exists between two persons in a social situation. “It is the process of influencing the organized group towards accomplishing its goals” (Roach & Beling, ). It is a working relationship among a group of members in which leader acquires status through active participation and demonstration. If there is any problem regarding anything in an on going project or in a meeting then the group leaders can follow some simple steps.
1) Identify problem: one should identify the problem and the root cause of it.
2) Gather information: collect as much information as you can on that problem and see that the information can some time lead to a solution then and there. “Understanding the information also points us in the direction of getting more data. It points us to where the data will be most useful.” (Johnston, 2007)
3) Develop course of action: start talking actions and plan how to eradicate the problem. Some time’s it might take years to clear the problems.
4) Make a plan: It’s the basic plan how to proceed towards the solution. There might be several phases of executing a plan. Analyze and compare the course of action.
5) Implement the plan: start implementing the plan accordingly. In an organization there are different types of leadership among them the leadership style is the most important one. The style comes into play when the team is handling the projects. The leadership styles are
Autocratic
Participative
Delegative
Autocratic: This type of leadership is not often in any kind of organization. Usually the leaders will not allow the followers to think or take decisions. They only give orders and the followers are only supposed to execute them. This type of leadership is usually abusive all the time. This is called “bossing people around”. This is one of the bad types of leadership in an organization.
Participative: This type of leadership is most commonly found in the organizations. The leaders and the followers exchange their ideas before taking the final decision. This is the strength of an organization. The employers will respect that.
Delegative (free-rein): In this type of leadership the employees are free to take the decisions and the leaders are supposed to know what is going on in the company and have all the knowledge regarding the projects going on in the company because if the things go wrong at some point of time then the leaders are not to blame the employees. They must mot think in anger but should think wisely. When a person steps into the organization he should find out the next immediate boss and his higher laud of people and try to fit himself in the chain. The basic essence of the leadership is to have a vision unless you have the team and become an effective leader.
It is not necessary that a leader has to be a leader in all the situations. He can be a follower in some situations and some other might lead him.(Gardner, J.W) This might be one of the key opportunities to study the strategic leadership refers to the study of executives who have overall responsibility for the firm and how their decision effect organizational outcomes.
“Servant-Leadership is a practical philosophy which supports people who choose to serve first, and then lead as a way of expanding service to individuals and institutions”(Almora, 2007). This type of leadership is practice in all the corporate companies. It is true that people serve first and then they take charge to expand their services to the organizations and to companies and the organizations.
There are four components of strategic leadership that will lead to enhanced organizational performance.
1) Purpose or vision of the firm: Leaders must make a realistic statement about why the firm exists and what is distinctive about it. The statement will then empower members of the organization to develop and execute strategies that are inline with the visions of the firm.
2) Find or explore the core competencies: The core competencies are resources and capabilities that give firms and edge over their rivals.
3) Developing human capital: Here human capital refers to the knowledge of the employee who is actually working for the firm. It is all about the skills, knowledge and abilities of the firms employees.
4) Emphasizing ethical practices: Top managers who use honesty, trust and integrity on their decision making are able to inspire their employees and create an organizational culture that encourages the use of ethical practices.
Strategic controls are accomplished through information exchange that helps to develop strategies where as financial controls are accomplished through setting objective criteria such as performance targets.
Strategic leadership is the ability to influence others that enhance the long term viability of an organization. Strategic leadership is a combination of managerial leadership and visionary leadership. Managerial leaders influence only actions/decisions of those with whom they work and are involved in. Visionary leaders influence the opinions and attitudes of others within the organization. They are concerned with insuring the future of an organization through the development and management of people.
Even in an organization when a leader fails to exercise his duty he is never down or will not hesitate to accept new challenges. Because it’s not how many time you knocked down (D) but it is how many times you got up (D+1)(Dr.Gillette). As long as a person have a clear vision of what the organization’s goal should be and can lead or inspire people towards the goal. You can learn all the technical skills, but you have to have the will to succeed. It’s not what you know in an organization. It’s who you know in the organization.
Some times as a leader, while making decisions you actually have to think how a employee wants to get things done depending on the resources made available to him. This helps to get the work done in an orderly fashion and avoids confusion. What a leader really should do when a project was assigned to him is he should manage complexity first by planning and budgeting setting targets or goals for the future, establishing detailed steps for achieving those targets and then allocating resources to accomplish those plans.
Conclusion: It doesn’t matter whether leaders are born or made or some combination of both, it is clear that leaders are not like other people. Leaders do not have great men or women by being intellectual geniuses to succeed but they just need the right information at right time and this information is not present with all the people. We need to carefully choose the leaders and train them effectively, because every individual does matter.
References
Johnston, B. (2007). The impact of wisdom on decision making process Retrieved on July 16, 2007, from Center for information and Communication Sciences, CICS Weblogs website: http://www.cicsworld.org/bcjohnston/2007/06/the_impact_of_wisdom_on_the_de.html#more
Kotter, J. P. (1990). What leaders really do. In Wren, J. (Eds.). (1995). Leader’s companion: Leader’s Companion Insights on leadership through ages. New York: Free Press.
Burns, J. M. (1980). Transactional and transformational Leadership Leader’s companion: Leader’s Companion Insights on leadership through ages. New York: Free Press.
Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership. In J.T Wren,(Ed.), (1995). Leader’s Companion Insights on leadership through ages. New York: Free Press.
Gardener, J. W. (1987). Leaders and follower Leader’s companion: Leader’s Companion Insights on leadership through ages. New York: Free Press.
Rost, J. C. (1991). Leaders and followers are the people in this relationship. In J.T Wren, (Ed.), (1995). Leader’s Companion Insights on leadership through ages. New York: Free Press.
Butler, E. A. (1996). Leadership and direction: Problem Solving: Retrieved on June 26, 2007 from Art and Science of leadership http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/leaderdir.html
Butler, G., & Hope, T. (1996). Managing your mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tannenbaum, R. & Schmit, W. How to choose a leadership pattern. Havard Business Review. Retrieved on June 26, 2007, from http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leaders/leadstl.html
Alamro, N. (2007, June 6), Servant leadership. Retrieved July 07, 2007 from Center for Information and Communication Sciences, CICS Weblogs Website: http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/nalamro/2007/06/servantleader.html#more