<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Kelly Antoine</title>
      <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:32:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Newsletter # 5</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Microsoft to pay 367 Million to Alcatel- Lucent</strong></em><br />
On Friday 4th April, 2008 the jury of the U.S. District Court in San Diego ordered Microsoft to pay 367 Million dollars to Alcatel –Lucent for violating two patents. According to the Associated Press, the court found that “ handwriting recognition technology in Microsoft's Tablet PC operating system infringed on pattern recognition patents held by Paris-based Alcatel-Lucent[and] that some of Microsoft's programs, including the Outlook e-mail application and the Windows Mobile operating system, infringed on an Alcatel-Lucent patent in the way users select calendar dates from a menu.” (Mintz, 2008) However, Microsoft was found not guilty for infringing a video decoding patent that is associated with the way the Windows operating system plays DVDs.<br />
The fact that the jury decided that they did not violate all four patents and denied Alcatel- Lucent the 1.75 billion dollars in damages that they sought, was considered a victory by Microsoft.   <br />
Microsoft however, plans to appeal this decision as well as put forth their own case against Alcatel- Lucent for violating nine patents in a trial which will begin April 22, 2008.</p>

<p><em><strong>Sources:</strong></em><br />
Mintz, J. (2008). Microsoft to appeal $367 million ruling it infringed on Alcatel-Lucent patents. Retrieved April 06, 2008, from The Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/04/AR2008040403357.html</p>

<p>Microsoft loses $367 million patent case. (2008). Retrieved April 5, 2008, from United Press International: http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Business/2008/04/05/upi_newstrack_business/4802/</p>

<p>Microsoft ordered to pay $ 367 million to Lucent Alcatel. (2008, April). Retrieved April 7, 2008, from Mister-Info.com: http://www.mister-info.com/?cmd=displaystory&story_id=10411&format=html<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2008/04/newsletter_5.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2008/04/newsletter_5.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:32:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Newsletter Article #4 - T-Mobile plans to replace land line phone services.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>T-Mobile USA Inc. announced that it would be rolling out a new internet calling plan aimed at replacing consumers’ home landline phone services. T-Mobile has outlined two test markets one in Seattle and the other in Dallas.  According to Information week, the company also plans to deploy its nationwide Advanced Wireless Service (ACS) which would “serve as the foundation of most if not all of T-Mobile’s wireless services [ by utilizing ] the GSM standard ” (Gardner, 2008) This service would use least cost routing to turn landline calls into mobile- to- mobile calls. This move would put an added pressure onto traditional phone companies like AT&T and Verizon Communications Inc. as well as provide competition for internet phone providers such as Vonage Holding Corp. </p>

<p>T- Mobile’s service would require customers to purchase an internet router for $50 and pay a $10 monthly service charge for unlimited service. This may encourage many customers to reconsider the necessity of having both there wireless and landline services. According to The Wall Street Journal “about 12 % of consumers in a recent Jupiter Research survey said they expect to drop their landline service in the next 12 months and use only a cell phone.” (Sharma, 2008) This move by T- Mobile might increase the demand for VOIP services thus eroding the profitability of landline services. </p>

<p>Sources:<br />
Gardner, D. W. (2008, Feburary 21). Retrieved Feburary 21, 2008, from Informationweek.com: http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206800967<br />
Sharma, A. (2008). T-Mobile Looks to Replace the Home Phone. The Wall Street Journal , B3.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2008/03/newsletter_article_4_tmobile_p.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2008/03/newsletter_article_4_tmobile_p.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:30:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Newsletter Article # 3 - Google Extends its Advertising to Web Videos.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>On February 21, 2008, Google announced that they would begin selling advertising to appear in web videos. This statement came after Google’s announcement of its partnership with YuMe. YuMe is “the first dedicated broadband video advertising network[…] that offers a safe advertising experience that can be delivered to any device – PC, TV or  mobile” (YuMe- About Us, 2007). YuMe intends to serve In Video overlay advertisements as part of Google’s AdSense for its video beta services. “Google has traditionally used AdSense for text-only advertising but said the video program extends its offer to targeted, contextually –relevant video graphical ads and txt overlays.” (CDRINFO.COM, 2008) </p>

<p>According to The Wall Street Journal, these ads will appear in two formats, graphical and animation and would be sold by “number of impressions” or by the number of clicks received. This partnership would undoubtedly extend Google’s command on internet advertising.<br />
 <br />
Sources:<br />
CDRINFO.COM. (2008). Retrieved Feburary 21, 2008, from CDRinfo : The Hardware Authority: http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/News/Details.aspx?NewsId=22559<br />
Google to Sell Third -Party Web Ads. (2008). The Wall Street Journal , B2.<br />
YuMe- About Us. (2007). Retrieved Feburary 21, 2008, from YuMe: http://www.yumenetworks.com/about.html</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2008/03/newsletter_article_3_google_ex.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2008/03/newsletter_article_3_google_ex.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:29:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Newsletter Article # 2- AOL&apos;s Ties to Google</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft‘s plans to buy Yahoo may have created some ripples in the Google camp, but not enough. Google however, may have an ally if the Microsoft-Yahoo merger comes to pass, it is AOL. On February 6th, 2008 CEO of Time Warner, Jeff Bewkes announced that AOL’s dial up service would be dissected from its free ad- supported portal. This could mean a possible sale or alliance with Google, who already owns 5% of AOL.  On July 1st 2008, Google would have the opportunity to take its AOL shares public. This could be a chance for AOL to negotiate either a sale or even a larger partnership with Google, who might at that time, be faced with competitive pressure from a possible Microsoft-Yahoo Merger.</p>

<p>According to news analysis Tom Lowry and Catherine Holahan, “an AOL pairing would help Google [with] editorial content.” In December 2007 according to comScore, Yahoo Finance and MSN Money had a combined 24.2 million unique monthly visitors while AOL Money & Finance had 13.5 million and Google a meager 782,000.  A possible Google- AOL merger would undoubtedly be closely scrutinized by regulators, much like Google’s acquisition of DoubleClick. Issues such as anti- trust, privacy and data collection would be at the forefront. However, if the Microsoft- Yahoo deal happens this may make it easier for Google to acquire AOL.</p>

<p>Sources<br />
Lowry, Tom, and Catherine Holahan. "Breaking AOL in Two: Time Warner's plan to separate AOL's free, ad-supported portal from its dial-up business could lead to closer ties with Google." businessweek.com. 7 Feb. 2008. 10 Feb. 2008 <http://www.businessweek.com/print/technology/content/feb2008/tc2008026_677910.htm>. </p>

<p>Fabrikant, Geraldine. "Time Warner Plans to Split off AOL's Dial-Up Service." nytimes.com. 7 Feb.2008. 7 Feb. 2008 <http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/07/business/07warner.html>. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2008/03/newsletter_article_2_aols_ties_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2008/03/newsletter_article_2_aols_ties_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:26:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Newsletter Article # 1- Auction 73</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p> The much anticipated transition from analog to digital television takes another step in its journey on Jan 24, 2008 with The Federal Communication Commission’s Auction 73. With a date of February 17th 2009 set as the day by which broadcasters surrender all analog licenses, the government must be prepared for a smooth transition. The FCC’s auction of spectrum not only allows for this but would also raise a substantial amount of money for the Treasury as it faces a huge deficient due to the war and the numerous natural disasters that have plagued the nation  recently.<br />
This auction would allocate the last portion of the most sought-after airwaves for wireless services. These broadcasting analog licenses are desirable because the can travel long distances and, because they are of a lower frequency can penetrate buildings easily. All of these characteristics make them essential to not only wireless and other telecommunication companies who intend to expand their broadband capabilities and services, but also to some unlikely companies who plan on using this spectrum to improve some of their logistical problems.<br />
Some of the contenders in the auction are Verizon Wireless, AT&T who according the Business Week may enter into an alliance with fellow auction participant Frontier Wireless aka Dish Network. Sprint Nextel are also considered to be top competitors for the spectrum because they plan to fully launch WiMax technology later in 2008. This may come as a surprise after their announcement that they intend to lay off 4000 workers in February due to a falling stock price and subscriber losses. Then there is Google who plans on bidding in an attempt to foster support for its Open Handset Alliance which would undoubtedly with the recent support of Microsoft , create some effect on the industry.  Another surprising auctioneer is Chevron USA an oil company who plans to use the spectrum to build their own communication network in order to communicated with their workers as well as tracking and monitoring there trucks and containers. (Kharif)<br />
The winners in the auction are highly anticipated and may change the way we view and access wireless technologies. <br />
Sources:<br />
"FCC AUTION: FACTSHEET: AUCTON73." Federal Communication Commission. 7 Jan. 2008. 20 Jan. 2008 <http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_factsheet&id=73>. </p>

<p>Kharif, Olga. "Look Who's Bidding in Auction 73." businessweek.com. 20 Dec. 2007. 20 Jan. 2008<br />
     <http://www.businessweek.com/print/technology/content/dec2007/tc20071219_023238.htm>. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2008/03/newsletter_article_1_auction_7_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2008/03/newsletter_article_1_auction_7_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:19:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Random Thoughts on Information Renaissance</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The growth of the World Wide Web substantially affected the amount of and availability of information. It opened up cultural barriers and increased awareness politically, socially and economically. The playing fields have flattened and we as a people are no longer disadvantaged by the inability to compete. Human capita has grown substantially because of this accessibility to information and  the ease of communication. The Information Renaissance has impacted the lives of not only my generation but also the one that follows, much like the European Renaissance helped  defined the society of the 15th century and beyond. Social norms are changing rapidly  as emerging technologies and innovation begin to dominate our daily lives. We as a society has willingly accepted our roles in this transition and as such  life as we know it would never be the same.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/12/random_thoughts_on_information.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/12/random_thoughts_on_information.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 01:08:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Unsung Hero- Part 2</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Television <br />
By the time Guillermo Gonzalez Camarena was 17, he built his first monochromatic television. According to an article from the International Electro technical Commission website, he built this camera “from scrap materials he got from flea markets” (IEC History). Guillermo worked tirelessly to improve his television equipment and always had the notion of incorporating color. By 1939, he had developed a Trichromatic system to be used in the transmissions of color televisions. The following year, at the age of 22 Guillermo was able to obtain a US patent for his invention. He later registered his invention with the Mexican Office of Patents and Trademarks in an attempt to restrict unauthorized use of his invention in Mexico. As indicated by sources, “Camerena began experimenting with television transmissions […] and in 1946 he founded XE1GGC- Channel 5, the first experimental television station in Mexico” (IEC History). On August 31, 1946 he successfully sent his first color transmission.<br />
Inventions<br />
Great strides were being made in the field of broadcasting as a result of Guillermo’s invention of the Trichromatic system in 1940. By 1942 he was able to procure another U.S. Patent for a mechanically scanned color filter adaptor which was used for an existing monochrome electronic transmission system. It was noted in an article entitled “Can the inventor of the first color television be Latin American?”  that in 1948 he invented the first remote control in Mexico, which was showcased at the presidential Objective Exposition in Mexico City. <br />
Around the year 1950, the great work that was being done in Mexico to enhance the television industry piqued the interest of not only excited consumers from within and around Mexico, but also The Columbia College of Chicago. They requested the manufacture of a television system, this proved to be very important because at the time RCA was also developing color television systems. By the mid 1950s television sales soared which allowed Camarena to merge with Channel 2.  He was later named technical advisor of Mexican Telesistema. (Wikipedia)<br />
The system of color transmission received rave reviews in 1960 when it was first tested in Guadalajara. Guillermo during this period continued to improve on and invent new technologies for the enhancement of television. In 1962 he was able to procure another patent for his “kaleidoscope” which was an innovative system that was later known as the “simplified bi-color” (IEC History). By 1963 in Mexico color transmissions were being broadcasted to televisions in shopping centers to be enjoyed by all. In May 1963 presented his System Simplified Two- color pencil, this system significantly reduced the cost of manufacturing a color television system which satisfied Camerena’s aim which was to provide technology for all regardless of economic strata.<br />
 <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/12/the_unsung_hero_part_2.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/12/the_unsung_hero_part_2.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:25:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Unsung Hero</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>“My ideal is to build economic receptors so that everyone can have one” (Guillermo Gonzalez Camarena)</p>

<p>In today’s society, every aspect of life is directly affected by some form of broadcasting. The field of broadcasting can be described as “the distribution of audio and video signals which is used to transmit programs to a wider audience”. (Society of Broadcast Engineers).  Broadcasting not only affects consumer behaviors, but allows us to interact with each other, as well as keeps us informed about what happens around us and in foreign countries. This paper explores the life of an amazing individual who has improved our quality of life and laid the platform onto which others have built.</p>

<p>Throughout history there has always been controversy about original inventions. The question of who really invented a particular device and the notion that some simply built onto an existing technology and coined it as their own has occurred on numerous occasions. The story of Guillermo Gonzalez Camerena is no different. Many are of the view that he was not the first to invent a color television transmission system, and few people today even know who he was and what his contributions to the television system were. Little is really known about his life but the imprint he has left behind would forever be felt in the fields of television and radio broadcasting, especially in Mexico.<br />
Guillermo Gonzalez Camerena’s life and work proved to be exceptionally important, not only to the people of Mexico but also to all Latin Americans. He represented and exemplified the notion that scientist from developed countries can in fact, excel in a field that was traditionally reserved for scientists from fully industrialized or developed countries. He believed that his inventions would not only entertain and educate but would also help bridge the gap between people who had limited resources and those who could otherwise afford luxuries, which at the time was television. </p>

<p>The Early Years<br />
Guillermo Gonzalez Camarena was born on the February 17, 1917 to Arturo Gonzalez and Sara Camarena in the Guadalajara, the capital city of the Mexican state Jalisco.  By the time Guillermo turned two the family moved to Mexico City. As a child Guillermo was fascinated by the electronic toys, and by the age of twelve he had successfully constructed his first fan transmitter. In 1930 Guillermo enrolled in the School of Mechanical Engineers and Electricians, now known as the ESIME of the National Polytechnic Institute.  After studying for two years, he left and became a radio operator with the Mexican Department of Public Education (IEC History).  After his invention of the Trichromatic system Guillermo began work as a chief operator at the radio stations XEW and XEQ which were located in Mexico City. Guillermo’s experience was not limited to working within the radio industry; he was most famous for his impact on the evolution of television and its implementation within the Mexican society. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/12/the_unsung_hero.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/12/the_unsung_hero.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:23:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Disaster Recovery- Part 1</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In today’s environment, world events have challenged us to not only be aware, but also to be prepared for the unknown. This is especially true for the business environment, having a basic emergency response plan and implementing disaster management scenarios are no longer appropriate. Organizations are now forced to implement comprehensive processes known collectively as Disaster Recovery. Disaster Recovery is also referred to as Business Continuity.  The creation of an on-going, interactive process that ensures the continuation of organizations critical business functions, during and after a major catastrophe is the basis for Disaster Recovery. Disaster Recovery can be defined as ‘the ability to respond to an interruption in services by implementing a disaster recovery plan to restore an organization's critical business functions.’(it.jhu.edu).  Business Continuity is a comprehensive managed effort to prioritize key business processes, [that] identifies significant threats to normal operation, and plan mitigation strategies to ensure effective and efficient organizational response to the challenges that surface during and after a crisis. (ASIS GDL, 7)<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/12/disaster_recovery_part_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/12/disaster_recovery_part_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:09:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Europen Renaissance- Art</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Europe Renaissance marked a period in history that marked the drastic change from the middle ages to modern time. It is sometimes referred to a as a cultural rebirth, and affected the world of art in an immeasurable way.  The incorporation of perspective allowed for the creation of realism within the realm of artistic expression. The use of light and shadow became critical to many such as Leonardo and Michelangelo. During this period art was seen as being an integral part of emotional expression. Art like many other forms of communication, allows us to fully examine the continuous, unrepeatable and accumulative nature of communication, especially that of an interpersonal nature. It is believed that interpersonal communication is directly linked to the present conditions as well as past situations, and situations experienced by the individuals that were similar in nature. These experiences lay the groundwork for the reactions given to particular situations and as such have the ability to shape the present circumstances. All experiences are products of learned behavior whether it is from socio-economic or political factors and can be expressed through art.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/12/europen_renaissance_art.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/12/europen_renaissance_art.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:03:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Achieving Success- Part 2</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>  Good to Great also cited three main concepts that were crucial to obtaining success or “greatness,” these were very similar to Peters and Waterman Jr.’s argument. They were Disciplined People, Disciplined Thought and Disciplined Action. Having the right combination of passion, knowledge of one’s company and market  proved to be the keys to success. (The Hedgehog Concept) The Disciplined People concept according to Collins meant having an organization with the right people, and getting rid of the wrong people. He put forth the idea of “Level 5 leadership,” which refers to a “five –level hierarchy of executive capabilities” (GTG pg.39) Level 5 leaders were usually very humble and professional. Brian Roberts, CEO of Comcast, is a perfect example of a Level 5 Leader. Level 4 leaders were referred to by Collins as being the “Effective Leader.” The Effective Leaders’ job was to speed up commitment and stimulate higher performance standards for those below him. Level 3 Leaders, otherwise known as “Competent Mangers,” organized people and resources in order to explore key objectives. Level 2 leaders, the “Contributing Team Members” used their capabilities to achieve group objectives. Level 1 leaders were the “Highly Capable Individual” who, according to Collins, made productive contributions by using their good works habits and talents. Disciplined thought however, meant that the organization must confront the fact that there would be difficulties and chaos, but maintaining faith and being disciplined would prepare the organization for difficult periods. Disciplined Action meant having a disciplined work force, which eliminated the need for hierarchy and excessive controls. (GTG) Today we still see evidence of these factors in institutions like, Wells Fargo, Phillip Morris and 3M. </p>

<p>In contrast, Good to Great emphasized the need not just for people as stated by Peters and Waterman Jr., but for the right people, in order for an organization to work effectively and achieve greatness. Both books touched on similar issues and saw the importance of having good leaders within the organization as well as the need for flexibility allowing for innovation to take place even amidst chaos. However, I am of the view that In Search Of Excellence, despite its age, is more relevant to the issues that face companies today. Its analysis was more in-depth and the concepts mentioned are still followed as ways to become better in any industry. Most of the companies in their study are still doing well today unlike many sourced in Good to Great, such as Circuit City. Good to Great, although there are significant points and ideas, falls short because it doesn’t offer a way to maintain the greatness as needs of consumers and technologies change.</p>

<p>Both books shed light and provide insight into the issues associated with Management. Management issues have remained constant for many years, even though technologies advance and practices differ, the human nature has remained the same and would be  so in years to come. The findings brought forward by Peters, Waterman Jr. and Collins prove to be valuable tools to carry into the workplace, because they transcend industry and offer solutions to ubiquitous problems. </p>

<p>Works Cited<br />
Peters, Thomas J., and Robert H. Waterman Jr. In Search Of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best Run Companies. New York, NY: Warner Books Inc., 1984. </p>

<p>Collins, Jim. Good To Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap and Others Don't. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers Inc., 2001. </p>

<p>"Hewlett-Packard's profit soars." CNN Money.com. 16 Aug. 2007. 30 Aug. 2007 <http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/16/news/companies/hewlett_packard.reut/index.htm>. </p>

<p><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/11/achieving_success_part_2.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/11/achieving_success_part_2.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:24:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Achieving Success- Part 1</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p> In today’s world of business there is no room for failure. Expectations are high, so too is the emphasis placed on achieving success and maximizing performance. Like many researchers, Tom Peters, Robert Waterman Jr. and Jim Collins were intrigued by the prospect of obtaining the secrets to perfection as it pertains to business. Their extensive research and analysis has created two of the bestselling books of recent times, In Search Of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best Run Companies by Peters and Waterman Jr. and From Good To Great: Why Some Companies Make the leap… and Others Don’t by Collins. This essay examines the major arguments put forth by both books as well as their relevance in today’s realm of business.   </p>

<p>In Search of Excellence’s major argument still proves to be applicable to today’s business environment. It centered on the people within an organization, Peters and Waterman Jr.  were of the belief that, “soft factors” such as “People, Customers and Action” were the major determinants for success. Peters and Waterman Jr. used the McKinsey 7-S Model as a frame of reference for their study. The McKinsey 7-S Model identified key components that should be considered when organizing, these were, “structure, strategy, systems, shared values, skills, style and staff”. With this as the platform for their research Peters and Waterman Jr. were able to unlock what they believed were the “eight attributes that characterize most nearly the distinction of the excellent, innovative companies.” (ISOE pg.13)</p>

<p>According to Peters and Waterman Jr., all successful companies shared these 8 basic principles 1. A Bias for Action, here they emphasized the importance of having a very fluid organization, they observed that most companies that practiced “MBWA- Management By Walking Around” were better able to communicate with their staff, allowing for things to get done quickly. 2. Close to Customer, this point emphasized how service and quality oriented these companies were, they listened to their users and filled niches within their particular industry. 3. Autonomy and Entrepreneurship, fostered innovation by encouraging staff members to excel in there given fields. 4. Productivity through People, these companies treated their employees as a source of quality; they realized that the best work would be received if they placed people in the areas they were most efficient in. 5. Hands on Value Driven, here they found that setting standards and enforcing the company’s values into everyday work practices usually gave good results. 6. Stick to the knitting, Peters and Waterman Jr. found that companies that expanded only in areas associated with their industry were among the most successful. 7. Simple form, Lean Staff, most successful companies had very few staff members in the Head Offices and worked with a very simple form of management. 8. Simultaneous loose –tight properties, gave value to the workers ability to complete their job in their own way, while incorporating the values of the company. (ISOE) These 8 factors still hold true for many companies in today’s business world, some good examples are Dell Inc. and Hewlett Packard; both are leaders in their industry. HP was recently named the “The world's largest maker of personal computers and printers” by CNN MONEY.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/11/achieving_success_part_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/11/achieving_success_part_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:19:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Search: How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture - A Review By Kelly Antoine</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Search: How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture. <br />
 By John Battelle.</p>

<p>In The Search: How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture  John Battelle gives us an account of Google’s rise.  The importance of search engines and  how they have changed, not only in the  realm of advertising and ecommerce,  but also its impact on culture and  society as a whole is examined. <br />
Battelle allows the reader to gain an understanding of the nature of the industry at the time of Google’s inception, by bringing to the forefront its competitors such as Yahoo and MSN, as well as the nature of internet advertising at that point in time. He clearly identifies the importance of search engines and their effect on everyday life. Search engines help organize and present information to both consumers and suppliers and allows for greater personalization and the analization of needs with respect to online advertising. This is done using a process called click stream. With an increase in the monitoring of web users companies now have the ability to correctly analyze and  in most situations anticipate one’s needs, it is here that the issue of privacy becomes a major concern. Battelle touches on this issue by highlighting  numerous examples of individuals who have used  Google’s  search and were able to obtain personal information about themselves  for example the ability to locate  an individual just by using their telephone number .<br />
Google despite its shortcomings are the leaders in this industry and as predicted by Battelle, would be in years to come due to their innovative ideas and unorthodox way of conducting business. They have forever impacted the cultural anthropology of our era.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/11/the_search_how_google_and_its.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/11/the_search_how_google_and_its.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:16:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Leadership: A  Brief Review  By Kelly Antoine</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Generating Buy-In: Mastering the Language of Leadership<br />
By Mark S. Walton</p>

<p>Mark Walton in Generating Buy In: Mastering the Language of Leadership examines the importance of a specific leadership quality which he refers to as “buy- in”.  Buy- In can be identified as having the ability to build, lead and manage organizations, motivate teams, promote ideas and generate support but most importantly it permits  the leader to obtain the support , commitment and loyalty of their customers whether they be internal or external. He is of the view that “the ability to influence people’s thoughts and feelings, […] has emerged as the paramount leadership skill” in today’s society which is more negotiation oriented, as opposed to authoritative in nature. <br />
Walton highlights three major actions necessary to generate buy-in, “Understanding the language of Buy-In”, “Speaking the Language of Buy-In” and “Putting the language to work”. Walton claims that the use of language can in most cases build strategic placement, by generating and delivering a story that projects a positive outcome to its listeners .This story then acts like a framework onto which you would be able to link not only the future you desire but also satisfy the needs of your listener, this is especially important in times of hardships.  The implementation of these skills as well as the identification of your objectives allows for a successful implementation of your goal.<br />
Mark Walton not only stresses the importance of communication skills but also channels the reader to effective ways of turning “cries into positive, value added outcomes”. <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/11/leadership_a_brief_review_by_k.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/11/leadership_a_brief_review_by_k.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:14:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>China, Friend or Foe?  By Kelly Antoine</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>China Inc: How the Rise of the Next Superpower Challenges America and the World<br />
By Ted C. Fishman</p>

<p>                    In China Inc: How the Rise of the Next Superpower Challenges America and the World, Ted Fisherman highlights some of the major concerns associated with the rapid increase in China’s industrial market as well the social, political and economic impact this rise has on the rest of the world. <br />
 	One of the major issues however, stems from the countries shift from communism to capitalism. This political shift enabled to a large extent, the economic co- dependency that the rest of the developed world has with China. This is especially true for the United States and Europe, not only does China have an overwhelming competitive advantage in the lower levels of the manufacturing industry but it also has in recent times, invested highly into other higher levels of industrialized products undoubtedly positioning itself for overall economic control. This view is supported by the overwhelming increase in capital investment that China receives, according to Fisherman it is ‘where the world is investing’.  The rise in capital investments is undoubtedly linked to the present stable political climate.  According to Fisherman, the large skilled disciplined labor workforce, working under a stable political system that has some understanding of English, makes China a growing threat. Its massive increase in population size  can be seen as the most troubling fact, because  China’s domestic market is at present highly underdeveloped, and as such has the ability to re-arrange the world’s economy  when it becomes fully matured, which may be in the near future. <br />
                        Ted Fisherman brings to the forefront a growing problem that may soon affect not only the economy but also the political stability of the world. As history has shown, economic leaders usually dictate political norms; as such China’s rise may create a cultural shock that can lead to a drastic change in international relations especially for the western world.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/11/a_review_of_china_inc.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cicsworld.org/blogs/kaantoine/2007/11/a_review_of_china_inc.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:11:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
